Why is PPE the last resort in hazard abatement?

• A. The equipment is variable in its effectiveness
• B. Workers may not use the equipment properly
• C. Elimination of the hazard is always preferred
• D. OSHA prefers that other methods be employed first

Answer: (C)

In hazard control, you tackle the danger from the strongest to the weakest protections. Elimination of the hazard removes the danger entirely, so workers can’t be exposed at all. PPE doesn’t remove the hazard itself; it only provides a barrier between the worker and the hazard, and its effectiveness hinges on proper selection, fit, training, maintenance, and consistent use. When feasible, higher-level controls like eliminating the hazard, substituting with a less dangerous option, or engineering and administrative measures reduce risk at the source and are more reliable than relying on people to wear protective gear correctly every time. PPE remains important, but it’s used when the hazard can’t be eliminated or fully controlled by other measures, or during transitions and special cases. That’s why eliminating the hazard is the preferred approach, with PPE as the last line of defense.